12th Vitreoretinal Symposium Frankfurt – Marburg 2009
Scientific programm: Abstract
Poster
50. Sparing Vitreoretinal Surgery for  
       Proliferative Diabetic Vitreoretinopathy
Michael M. Shishkin, N. N. Safarli (Moscow)
    
  The advent of pars plana vitrectomy by Robert Machemer [1995] considerably  improved the prognosis of advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy.  So-called minimal invasive surgery reflects a  new trend in vitreoretinal surgery. According to the slogan: “maximize the  efficiency by saving operating time and inducing less surgically induced  trauma”, a variety of techniques are under investigation in nowadays. Despite  improved techniques, the surgical prognosis is lagging behind patient expectations,  especially in cases of advanced proliferative stages.
  We describe our experiences with sparing and delicate approaches compared with  tradition vitreoretinal surgery for removing of fibrovascular membrane or  proliferative tissue. Although some risk factors for diabetic retinopathy have  been determined, the exact pathogenesis is yet unknown. Our clinical  observations shows that vitreoretinal traction   plays a key role in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic vitreoretinophaty  (PDVR)
  Objective: The goal of this study  was to compare and evaluate long-term results of  sparing   and traditional vitreoretinal surgery for PDVR.
  Methods: 62 eyes of 49 patients with  fibrovascular proliferation in advanced diabetic retinopathy performed by  vitrectomy from 2006 to 2009 were analyzed. All patients had a complete  ophthalmic examination preoperatively. Indications for surgery were: vitreous  hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage & tractional retinal detachment and  combined tractional-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. We used our modified  (sparing) surgical technique in 44 eyes (36 patients) and the traditional  vitreous surgery technique in 18 eyes ( 13 patients). Patients were operated on  by the same surgeon (S.M.M.). In the group that received the sparing surgical  technique all surgical procedures were performed under local anesthesia,  whereas the tradition technique was performed under general anesthesia. During  sparing surgery we carefully performed membrane dissection techniques  (segmentation and delamination) for removing of fibrovascular membrane where it  had low adherence to the  retina.,  We also avoided  totally removing the membrane and  en bloc membranectomy techniques when  fibrovascular membrane or proliferation tissue was highly adherent to the  retina; in these instances we retained the rest of proliferative membrane in  eyes. Consequently greatly reducing the likelihood of damage to the retina with  the instruments.
  The intraoperative and postoperative complications (retinal redetachments,  iatrogenic breaks, hemorrhages, secondary glaucoma and visual improvement) were  compared in both groups.
  Results: Sparing vitreoretinal  surgery showed a lower incidence of intraoperative and postoperative iatrogenic  breaks than traditional vitreous surgery. There were significant differences in  the rate of postoperative complication and visual improvement between both  techniques. The mean duration of surgery was notably shorter in the sparing  surgical technique than in the tradition approach, and all patients who  received the sparing technique reported minimal discomfort during the  procedure. We have not observed any postoperative reproliferation of  fibrovascular membrane or proliferative tissue (which was not fully removed and  remained in operated eyes after sparing vitrectomy) in the group treated with  the sparing technique (follow-up range 6 to 28 month).
  Conclusion: In summary our findings  suggest that- vitreoretinal traction (the static and dynamic tractional forces,  mechanical and tractional stess) - may be an important and a leading factor in  the pathogenesis of progressive fibrovascular proliferations of PDVR.  Our well-founded and reliable sparing  vitreoretinal approach offers the advantages of quicker and minimally invasive  surgery with faster - visual and somatic rehabilitation. In addition it offers  the advantages of less -surgical stress, shorter duration of surgery and  reduced incidence of postoperative complication   in  diabetic patients. Because of  its simplicity and the short duration of surgery, the procedure can be  performed under local anesthesia. 
Copyright © VRS-online, 1999-.
      All rights reserved. Impressum, rechtliche Hinweise 
HTML & Webdesign: SPALLEK.COM
